Feh

Jul. 28th, 2006 11:41 pm
pm215: (Default)
[personal profile] pm215

Somebody has apparently got hold of my credit card details and run up about a grand's worth of fraudulent purchases. Fortunately I wasn't intending to use my card while I was here and hopefully the Coop will sort out issuing a new card and so on with as little hassle as they did last time this happened (about five years ago).

Date: 2006-07-28 10:13 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Er no - it's a credit card so the card holder is not liable for fraudulent transactions. Chip n pin does not alter the Consumer Credit Act of 1974.

Date: 2006-07-28 10:33 pm (UTC)
uitlander: (Default)
From: [personal profile] uitlander
Chip and pin has changed the basis of the proof of liability/negligence. It makes no changes to the act itself - only Parliament can do that. The reasoning goes that a pin is now required to complete a transaction, and the cardholder has agreed to keep that pin secret - so if the pin has been used the cardholder has disclosed it and so is liable to foot the bill. People have argued against this with varying degrees of success - depending on which financial institution issued the card.

This does not apply to 'card not present' fraud - only transactions where a pin hsa been entered.

February 2019

M T W T F S S
    12 3
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728   

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 6th, 2026 09:34 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios